The First Deputy Minority Whip, Ahmed Ibrahim, has provided clarity on why he no longer supports his party’s decision to oppose the controversial Legislative Instrument (LI) that would have allowed Members of Parliament (MPs) to fix sirens on their vehicles.
His explanation comes in the wake of a revised version of the LI, which was laid before Parliament on September 4, 2024, and notably excluded MPs from the provision.
In July, the Minority Leader, on behalf of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), had issued a strongly worded statement instructing all NDC MPs to reject the proposed legislation.
The opposition followed widespread public outcry, as many Ghanaians expressed concerns about the possible abuse of power by MPs if allowed to use sirens, leading to its initial withdrawal.
However, speaking to Ahotor News, Ahmed Ibrahim explained his shift in position, stating that while the initial opposition was rooted in public sentiment, his stance has evolved after reflecting on the practicality and safety concerns related to MPs’ work.
He emphasized that the role of MPs often requires them to travel swiftly between constituencies and other official duties, and in some instances, the use of sirens could be justified for ensuring their safety and timely arrival at important engagements.
“I initially stood by the collective decision of the Minority to reject the LI, understanding the public’s frustration.
But upon further reflection, I can no longer, in good conscience, oppose the use of sirens by MPs in certain situations,” Ibrahim explained. “As public officials, there are moments when swift movement is critical for us to effectively perform our duties, and having the option to use sirens could aid that.”
He further clarified that his current stance is not about supporting MPs’ privilege but rather ensuring that MPs can fulfill their responsibilities without unnecessary hindrance, especially in cases of emergencies or time-sensitive matters.
The revised version of the LI, now excluding MPs from the privilege, has sparked fresh debates about whether the government should reconsider allowing sirens for lawmakers, but Ibrahim believes the conversation should be balanced and pragmatic.
He stressed the importance of clearly defining the terms under which sirens could be used to avoid abuse while still ensuring public officials can effectively serve their constituents.
Ahmed Ibrahim’s position reflects a more nuanced view, aiming to balance public interest with the practical realities of governance.
He called for a deeper dialogue on the issue to reach a consensus that respects both public opinion and the operational needs of lawmakers.
LISTEN TO THE AUDIO BELOW:
Story by: Osei Akoto (Teacher Kojo) #Ahotoronline.com
